Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z800 3DVisor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to EMagin. Star Mississippi 18:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Z800 3DVisor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Z800 3DVisor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find sources to prove WP:N. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect or redirect to eMagin but it currently hasn't been considered notable enough for a mention in that article. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 14:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• Keep - Article had poor sourcing. Nominator should have done a better research. I have added 7 new sources including CNET and PC MAG.Bikerose (talk) 20:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

  • CNET: Situational (per WP:RSP)
  • PCMAG: Reliable (per WP:VG/S)
  • New Atlas: (Presumed) reliable (per RSN archive 375)
  • Don’t see anything about SimHQ, oled.com. The rest are probably primary sources.

  Based on the sources @Bikerose gave, I’d lean Weak Keep. However, CNET can be replaced with a better source. Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge to eMagin; the article on the company is very short, and this is the only product by the company for which we have an article; there is no need for separate pages. BD2412 T 01:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.